Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 320M Quadro FX 2500M
Red Dead Redemption 2 2278% 2542%
Cyberpunk 2077 3167% 3530%
Doom Eternal 1944% 2172%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1367% 1530%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2278% 2542%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3167% 3530%
FIFA 20 1167% 1307%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3533% 3937%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 3167% 3530%
Need For Speed Heat 2278% 2542%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 320M are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 2500M.

The GeForce 320M was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 2500M, and so the GeForce 320M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 2500M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 2500M has 1024 MB video memory, but the GeForce 320M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M has 48 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 2500M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 2500M requires 45 Watts. The Quadro FX 2500M requires 22 Watts more than the GeForce 320M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 2500M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 320M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTesla MCP89G71GLM
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2010vs29 Sep 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
2.4
green tick vs -
1920x1080
1.7
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs600 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs38.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units48vs-
Actual Shader Performance2%vs-
Technology40nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units16vs-
Texture Rate7.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate3.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power23 Wattsvs45 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs9.0c
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL3.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body