In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Pulse ITX 4GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Asus Dual OC 4GB.

The GTX 1650 has a 317 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 570, but the RX 570 has 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1650. As a result, the RX 570 exhibits a 66.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1650. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1650 has a 317 MHz higher core clock speed than the RX 570 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 1650 providing 10.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1650 was released over a year more recently than the RX 570, and so the GTX 1650 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the RX 570.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Asus Dual OC 4GB and the Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Pulse ITX 4GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The RX 570 has 95.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1650, which means that the memory performance of the RX 570 is massively better than the GTX 1650.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Asus Dual OC 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Pulse ITX 4GB has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1650 is 1572 and the actual shader performance of the RX 570 is 2548. The RX 570 having 976 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 570 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 1650.

The GTX 1650 transistor size technology is 2 nm (nanometers) smaller than the RX 570. This means that the GTX 1650 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the RX 570.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Asus Dual OC 4GB requires 75 Watts to run and the Radeon RX 570 Sapphire Pulse ITX 4GB requires 120 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1650 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 570. The RX 570 requires 45 Watts more than the GTX 1650 to run. The difference is significant enough that the RX 570 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1650.