Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 460 Dataland X-Serial 4GB Radeon HD 7950 VTX3D 3GB Boost X-Edition
Halo: Reach 47% 45%
Cyberpunk 2077 128% 137%
Red Dead Redemption 2 66% 72%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2% 6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66% 72%
Doom Eternal 43% 48%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 128% 137%
Grand Theft Auto VI 153% 163%
FIFA 20 12% 8%
Need For Speed Heat 66% 72%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 460 Dataland X-Serial 4GB are marginally better than the AMD Radeon HD 7950 VTX3D 3GB Boost X-Edition.

The RX 460 has a 210 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7950, but the HD 7950 has 56 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 460. As a result, the HD 7950 exhibits a 37.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 460. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX 460 has a 210 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7950, but the HD 7950 has 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 460. As a result, the HD 7950 exhibits a 10.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 460. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 460 was released over three years more recently than the HD 7950, and so the RX 460 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 7950 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The HD 7950 has 1024 MB more video memory than the RX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 7950 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 7950 has 128 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 460, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7950 is massively better than the RX 460.

The Radeon RX 460 Dataland X-Serial 4GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7950 VTX3D 3GB Boost X-Edition has 1792. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 460 is 1107 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7950 is 1417. The HD 7950 having 310 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7950 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 460.

The RX 460 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 7950. This means that the RX 460 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 7950.

The Radeon RX 460 Dataland X-Serial 4GB requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 7950 VTX3D 3GB Boost X-Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 460 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7950. The HD 7950 has been recommended a PSU with 150 Watts more than the RX 460. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7950 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 460.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1090 MHzvs880 MHz
Boost Clock1236 MHzvs930 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Baffin PROGCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO2
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date28 Jul 2016vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
10
green tick vs
9.8
1920x1080
8.1
green tick vs
7.9
2560x1440
5.8
vs green tick
5.9
3840x2160
3.9
vs green tick
4.4

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112GB/secvs240GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 768 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1792
Actual Shader Performance53%vs68%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs112
Texture Rate61 GTexel/svs98.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate17.4 GPixel/svs28.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Watts-
Recommended PSU350 Watts & 23 Ampsvs500 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD FX-6100vsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 460 Dataland X-Serial 4GB is a middle-class graphics card based on the third revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture. It is the 4GB version of the RX 460, which should be considered for future proofing.

Architecture
It equips a GPU codenamed Baffin PRO which is a 3rd gen Pascal GPU, offering 896 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and has a 6-pin connector power requirement.

Performance
This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 460 4GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1600p screen res and expect around 45+FPS

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 460 X Serial 4GB by Dataland is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a mid range CPU and 8GB of system memory for optimal performance.
Radeon HD 7950 VTX3D 3GB Boost X-Edition is a special edition of the high-end Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition.
This edition comes with a custom cooling solution and overclocking out of the box in the core-clock that was increase by 30MHz to 880MHz. Therefore, the Turbo Boost is now of 930MHz.
Expect a 1.5% performance boost when compared to the reference Radeon HD 7950 Boost Edition.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body