Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB GeForce GTX 690
Cyberpunk 2077 63% 5%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 49% 4%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 45% 7%
FIFA 21 18% 47%
Watch Dogs Legion 58% 1%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 45% 7%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 134% 50%
Grand Theft Auto VI 130% 47%
Godfall 165% 70%
Genshin Impact 63% 5%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB.

The GTX 1050 has a 527 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 690, but the GeForce GTX 690 has 216 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 1050. As a result, the GeForce GTX 690 exhibits a 176.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 1050. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 1050 has a 527 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 690, but the GeForce GTX 690 has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 1050. As a result, the GeForce GTX 690 exhibits a 12.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 1050. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 1050 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 690, and so the GTX 1050 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 690 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 690 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 1050, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce GTX 690 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce GTX 690 has 271.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 1050, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 690 is massively better than the GTX 1050.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 690 has 3072. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 1050 is 1344 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 690 is 3130. The GeForce GTX 690 having 1786 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 690 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 1050.

The GTX 1050 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 690. This means that the GTX 1050 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 690.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 690 requires 300 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 1050 and a PSU with at least 650 Watts for the GeForce GTX 690. The GeForce GTX 690 requires 225 Watts more than the GTX 1050 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 690 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 1050.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 18.7 FPS on Metro: Exodus

Metro: Exodus

18.7 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 20 FPS on Control

Control

20 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 26.3 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

26.3 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 35.1 FPS on Just Cause 4

Just Cause 4

35.1 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 41.2 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

41.2 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 50.5 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

50.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 7.5 FPS on Battlefield V

Battlefield V

7.5 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 8 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

8 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 14 FPS on Far Cry: New Dawn

Far Cry: New Dawn

14 FPS

GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G 2GB gets 18.7 FPS on Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

18.7 FPS

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1442 MHzvs915 MHz
Boost Clock1556 MHzvs1019 MHz
ArchitecturePascal P107Kepler GK104-355-A2
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date25 Oct 2016vs03 May 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
8.3
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
6
vs green tick
7.8
3840x2160
4.5
vs green tick
5.7

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1752 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112.1GB/secvs384GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs3072
Actual Shader Performance65%vs100%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs256
Texture Rate57.7 GTexel/svs234.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs64
Pixel Rate46.1 GPixel/svs58.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs3
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections1vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs300 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 27 Ampsvs650 Watts & 38 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6500 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview

*At this moment in time the full specification has not been released, the only things known for certain are the clock speeds, we will update as soon as we find out more*

The latest GeForce GTX 1050 Colorful iGame U-2G is a version of Nvidia's lower end graphics card, designed to compete against AMDs more affordable gaming cards, like the RX 460 or RX 470 and expected to replace the outgoing GTX 960. It features an overclocked core speed and possibly more.

Architecture
The Pascal Architecture aims for twice as much performance as the Maxwell Architecture and Introduces support for Second Gen HBM.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GP107-400 which has 5 SM activated and thus 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1442MHz and goes up to 1556MHz with the Boost Clock.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 3504MHz which is outstanding.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, we are unsure of it's power connector requirements.

Performance
this card will enable mid level graphics performance on modern AAA 2016 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution.
Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 960.

System Suggestions
This card is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1600x900 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-6500 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance.
GeForce GTX 690 is a dual-GPU graphics card solution of two GeForce GTX 680 (not SLI) and part of the 600 Series released by NVIDIA in 2012.
As usual and a hindrance of dual-GPU graphics cards, the clock frequencies had to be reduced. However, NVIDIA managed to almost double-cross this problem by developing Turbo Boost technology that sets the GPU's core clock from 915 to 1019MHz. The other specs, such as the number of cores, memory speed, and memory bandwidth per GPU are the same on both cards.
The Performance is mind-blowing and indicated for gamers that use demanding technologies, such as Tesselation, paired with extreme resolutions and on games already Very Demanding from the start, such as Metro 2033 and The Witcher 2. GeForce GTX 690 is less expensive and energy consuming than GTX 680 put in Dual SLI.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-