In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 460 2GB are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 930 2GB.

The GT 930 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GT 930 was released less than a year after the RX 460, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB and the GeForce GT 930 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GT 930 has 16 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 460, which means that the memory performance of the GT 930 is slightly better than the RX 460.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 930 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 460 is 1075 and the actual shader performance of the GT 930 is 0. The RX 460 having 1075 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the RX 460 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GT 930.

The RX 460 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GT 930. This means that the RX 460 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GT 930.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 930 2GB requires 35 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 460 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GT 930. The RX 460 requires 40 Watts more than the GT 930 to run. The difference is significant enough that the RX 460 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GT 930.