Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon RX 460 2GB | GeForce GTX 950 2GB |
Hitman 3 | 137% | 158% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 82% | 98% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 67% | 81% |
Resident Evil 8 | 82% | 98% |
FIFA 21 | 8% | 0% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 156% | 179% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 61% | 75% |
Genshin Impact | 82% | 98% |
Far Cry 6 | 164% | 187% |
The Medium | 127% | 147% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon RX 460 2GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 2GB.
The RX 460 has a 66 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 950. This results in the RX 460 providing 11.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The RX 460 has a 66 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 950, but the GTX 950 has 16 more Render Output Units than the RX 460. As a result, the GTX 950 exhibits a 15.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 460. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The RX 460 was released less than a year after the GTX 950, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The Radeon RX 460 2GB and the GeForce GTX 950 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The GTX 950 has 105.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 460, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 950 is massively better than the RX 460.
The Radeon RX 460 2GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 950 2GB has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 460 is 1075 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 950 is 1232. The GTX 950 having 157 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 950 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 460.
The RX 460 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 950. This means that the RX 460 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 950.
The Radeon RX 460 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 950 2GB requires 90 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 460 and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the GTX 950. The GTX 950 requires 15 Watts more than the RX 460 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 950 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the RX 460.
Core Speed | 1090 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1024 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1188 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.3 Baffin PRO | Maxwell GM206-250 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 08 Aug 2016 | ![]() | vs | 20 Aug 2015 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | 9.6
|
|
1920x1080 | 7.9
|
![]() |
vs | 7.6
|
|
2560x1440 | 5.7
|
![]() |
vs | 5.5
|
|
3840x2160 | 3.7
|
vs | ![]() |
3.9
|
Memory | N/A | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2048 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1653 MHz | |
Memory Bus | - | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | - | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | ![]() | 105.8GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
1024 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | yes | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 896 | ![]() | vs | 768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 52% | vs | ![]() | 59% | |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 56 | ![]() | vs | 48 | |
Texture Rate | 61 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 49.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 17.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 32.8 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | ![]() | vs | 5120x3200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 3 | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | ![]() | vs | 90 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 350 Watts & 23 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 350 Watts & 23 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | vs | ![]() | 12.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | - | vs | ![]() | 5.0 | |
Open GL | - | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-4460 3.2GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon RX 460 2GB is a middle-class graphics card based on the third revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture. Note that there is a 4GB version of the RX 460, which should be considered for future proofing. Architecture It equips a GPU codenamed Polaris 10 which is a 1st gen Polaris GPU, offering 896 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 1750MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 460 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1600p screen res and expect around 45+FPS System Suggestions Radeon RX 460 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a mid range CPU and 8GB of system memory for optimal performance. | Overview GeForce GTX 950 2GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Maxwell architecture. Architecture GeForce GTX 950 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed GM206-250 which is a Second Gen Maxwell GPU. It offers DirectX Feature Level of 12.1 and the Third Generation Delta Color Compression Technology which increases bandwidth efficiency by 30%. It has 6 Stream Multiprocessors activated and offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs. GPU The central unit runs at 1024MHz and goes up to 1188MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1653MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 90W, it requires at least a 400W PSU and one available 6-pin connector. Performance Benchmarks Indicate Similar Performance to AMD's Radeon R9 270X, using the best suited Resolution - 1920x1080. As a Result, AMD's Radeon R9 370 is considerably slower and Large Factory Overclocked Versions of GeForce GTX 950, may match GeForce GTX 960's Performance. System Suggestions GeForce GTX 950 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. |
---|