1.5
Check Prices $110.00
3
Check Prices $299.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 460 2GB GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB
Hitman 3 137% 84%
Cyberpunk 2077 82% 41%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 67% 29%
Resident Evil 8 82% 41%
FIFA 21 8% 29%
Grand Theft Auto VI 156% 99%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 61% 25%
Genshin Impact 82% 41%
Far Cry 6 164% 104%
The Medium 127% 76%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon RX 460 2GB.

The RX 460 has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 960 Ti, but the GTX 960 Ti has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 460. As a result, the GTX 960 Ti exhibits a 39.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 460. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX 460 has a 40 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 960 Ti, but the GTX 960 Ti has 48 more Render Output Units than the RX 460. As a result, the GTX 960 Ti exhibits a 49.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 460. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 460 was released less than a year after the GTX 960 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 960 Ti has 224.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 460, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 960 Ti is massively better than the RX 460.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 460 is 1075 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 960 Ti is 1809. The GTX 960 Ti having 734 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 960 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 460.

The RX 460 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 960 Ti. This means that the RX 460 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 960 Ti.

The Radeon RX 460 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB requires 140 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the RX 460 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 960 Ti. The GTX 960 Ti requires 65 Watts more than the RX 460 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 960 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 460.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1090 MHzvs1050 MHz
Boost Clock1200 MHzvs1178 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Baffin PROMaxwell GM204-200-KD
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date08 Aug 2016vs31 Oct 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
7.9
vs green tick
8.9
2560x1440
5.7
green tick vs -
3840x2160
3.7
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed1750 MHzvs1753 MHz
Memory Bus-vs256 Bit
Memory Type-vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth-vs224.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1536
Actual Shader Performance52%vs87%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs96
Texture Rate61 GTexel/svs100.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate17.4 GPixel/svs67.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)7680x4320vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs140 Watts
Recommended PSU350 Watts & 23 Ampsvs450 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12
Shader Model-vs5.0
Open GL-vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6500 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 460 2GB is a middle-class graphics card based on the third revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture. Note that there is a 4GB version of the RX 460, which should be considered for future proofing.

Architecture
It equips a GPU codenamed Polaris 10 which is a 1st gen Polaris GPU, offering 896 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required.

Performance
This graphics card was designed and marketed towards the competitive MOBO gamers. A light weight, small form factor GPU solution that offers mobility, so that gamers travelling to events can bring a smaller cheaper gaming rig. The Radeon RX 460 2GB can play most modern games at medium graphics selection on a 1600p screen res and expect around 45+FPS

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 460 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a mid range CPU and 8GB of system memory for optimal performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB is an upcoming high-end Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM204-200-KD which has 12 SM activated and thus offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 96 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The central unit runs at ????MHz and goes up to ????MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1753MHz.

Features
DirectX 12.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 140W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Coming Soon!

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-