Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon RX 470 XFX Single Fan Triple X 4GB GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 25% 7%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 15% 15%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 11% 18%
FIFA 21 37% 53%
Grand Theft Auto VI 76% 30%
Hitman 3 63% 20%
Genshin Impact 25% 7%
Far Cry 6 81% 34%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 80% 33%
Watch Dogs Legion 21% 11%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI are significantly better than the AMD Radeon RX 470 XFX Single Fan Triple X 4GB.

The RX 470 has a 11 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 660 Ti, but the GTX 660 Ti has 240 more Texture Mapping Units than the RX 470. As a result, the GTX 660 Ti exhibits a 218.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the RX 470. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The RX 470 has a 11 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 660 Ti, but the GTX 660 Ti has 24 more Render Output Units than the RX 470. As a result, the GTX 660 Ti exhibits a 21.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the RX 470. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The RX 470 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 660 Ti, and so the RX 470 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 660 Ti when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 660 Ti has 2048 MB more video memory than the RX 470, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 660 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 660 Ti has 221.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the RX 470, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 660 Ti is massively better than the RX 470.

The Radeon RX 470 XFX Single Fan Triple X 4GB has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI has 4032. However, the actual shader performance of the RX 470 is 2511 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 660 Ti is 3951. The GTX 660 Ti having 1440 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 660 Ti delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the RX 470.

The RX 470 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 660 Ti. This means that the RX 470 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 660 Ti.

The Radeon RX 470 XFX Single Fan Triple X 4GB requires 120 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI requires 450 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the RX 470. The GTX 660 Ti requires 330 Watts more than the RX 470 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 660 Ti may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the RX 470.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed926 MHzvs915 MHz
Boost Clock1226 MHzvs980 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.3 Ellesmere PROKepler GK104-200-KD-A2 (x3)
OC Potential None vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date04 Aug 2016vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
9.4
vs green tick
10
2560x1440
7
green tick vs -
3840x2160
5.3
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed1650 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs576 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth211.2GB/secvs432.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 1152 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2048vs4032
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units96vs336
Texture Rate88.9 GTexel/svs307.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units48vs72
Pixel Rate44.4 GPixel/svs65.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections3vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power120 Wattsvs450 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-6600K 3.5GHzvsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon RX 470 4GB XFX Triple X is single fan small form factor performance graphics card, based on the fourth revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
N/A.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Ellesmere PRO which has 24 SM activated and thus 2048 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 8GB frame buffer of Fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface, while the Memory Clock Operates at 1750MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 120W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
The RX 470 should run most modern AAA games at 1080p on high graphics settings.

System Suggestions
Radeon RX 470 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080. We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3-way SLI is a solution of three GeForce GTX 660 Ti put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 660 Ti to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 660 Ti performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 660 Ti. Expect this combination to draw up to 450 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-