Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Quadro4 980 XGL | GeForce 6150 LE |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0% | 22961% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 0% | 20992% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 0% | 20308% |
FIFA 21 | 0% | 11533% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 0% | 32349% |
Far Cry 6 | 0% | 33267% |
Genshin Impact | 0% | 22961% |
Hitman 3 | 0% | 29900% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 0% | 22145% |
Mafia: Definitive Edition | 0% | 32961% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE are massively better than the Nvidia Quadro4 980 XGL.
The GeForce 6150 LE has a 125 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 980 XGL, but the Quadro4 980 XGL has 7 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Quadro4 980 XGL exhibits a 2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.
The GeForce 6150 LE has a 125 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 980 XGL, but the Quadro4 980 XGL has 3 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Quadro4 980 XGL exhibits a 0.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 9 or higher, so Pixel Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.
The GeForce 6150 LE was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 980 XGL, and so the GeForce 6150 LE is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 980 XGL.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Quadro4 980 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The Quadro4 980 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6150 LE has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the Quadro4 980 XGL has 2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate, 0.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate, and 5.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth, so should have a marginally faster performance than the GeForce 6150 LE.
The GeForce 6150 LE transistor size technology is 60 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 980 XGL. This means that the GeForce 6150 LE is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 980 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 6150 LE should consume less power than the Quadro4 980 XGL.
Core Speed | 300 MHz | vs | ![]() | 425 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | NV28GL A2 | C51 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 01 Nov 2002 | vs | ![]() | 11 Oct 2004 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | 128 MB | ![]() | vs | N/A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 325 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | DDR | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Bandwidth | 5.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | - | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 0% |
Technology | 150nm | vs | ![]() | 90nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
Texture Rate | 2.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 0.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
Pixel Rate | 1.2 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 0.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 8.1 | vs | ![]() | 9.0c | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 1.3 | vs | ![]() | 3.0 | |
Open GL | 1.5 | vs | ![]() | 2.1 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-860 Quad 2.80GHz | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 5760x1080 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Quadro4 980 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4600, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers. | Weak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |