Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i3 6308P Radeon R7 250X
Red Dead Redemption 2 1238% 312%
Cyberpunk 2077 1738% 465%
Doom Eternal 1050% 254%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 725% 154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1238% 312%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1738% 465%
FIFA 20 613% 119%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1944% 529%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 1738% 465%
Need For Speed Heat 1238% 312%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250X are massively better than the Intel HD i3 6308P.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 600 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD i3 6308P. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 35.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 600 MHz higher core clock speed and 12 more Render Output Units than the HD i3 6308P. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 13.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD i3 6308P was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R7 250X, and so the HD i3 6308P is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R7 250X.

The Radeon R7 250X has 2048 MB video memory, but the HD i3 6308P does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i3 6308P has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 250X has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i3 6308P is 101 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 250X is 517. The Radeon R7 250X having 416 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R7 250X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD i3 6308P.

The HD i3 6308P transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon R7 250X. This means that the HD i3 6308P is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon R7 250X.

The HD i3 6308P requires 54 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 250X requires 80 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD i3 6308P and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 250X. The Radeon R7 250X requires 26 Watts more than the HD i3 6308P to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 250X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the HD i3 6308P.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs950 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs-
ArchitectureSkylake GT1GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date27 Dec 2015vs10 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs1125 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs72GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units12vs640
Actual Shader Performance5%vs25%
Texture Mapping Units8vs40
Texture Rate2.8 GTexel/svs38 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs16
Pixel Rate1.4 GPixel/svs15.2 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power54 Wattsvs80 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs450 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium G4400 3.3GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD i3 6098P is the specific version of Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop that is integrated in the Core i3-6098P 3.6GHz Processor.

The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with the older Intel HD Graphics 4400.

System Suggestions
Intel HD i3 6308P is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon R7 250X is a fast-middle-class Graphics Card based on the Graphics Core Next architecture. It offers the Cape Verde XT GPU.
The Cape Verde XT Core is a GCN 1.1 GPU and was first seen on Radeon HD 7770 and then re-used in the OEM only Radeon HD 8760.
It offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bits memory interface of fast GDDR5.
Radeon R7 250X comes clocked at 950MHz (though there might be some 1GHz versions) and has its operating memory clock set at 1125MHz. The rated TDP board is of 80W and the release price around $99.
This card should come in 1GB and 2GB versions, though both will offer the same performance.
Its performance has proven to be exactly like Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition (if clocked at 1GHz) and thus this card is not suited for 1080p gaming but it can handle 720p with ease. The 950MHz versions will be around 3% slower.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants