Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 1050 | GeForce GTX 980 Palit JetStream 4GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 75% | 0% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 60% | 9% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 55% | 12% |
FIFA 21 | 12% | 50% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 147% | 41% |
Far Cry 6 | 153% | 45% |
Genshin Impact | 75% | 0% |
Hitman 3 | 128% | 30% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 69% | 4% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 151% | 43% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Palit JetStream 4GB Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050.
The GeForce GTX 1050 has a 228 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 980, but the GTX 980 has 88 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 1050. As a result, the GTX 980 exhibits a 89.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 1050. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GeForce GTX 1050 has a 228 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 980, but the GTX 980 has 32 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 1050. As a result, the GTX 980 exhibits a 28.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 1050. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce GTX 1050 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 980, and so the GeForce GTX 1050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 980.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The GTX 980 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 1050, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 980 also has superior memory performance overall.
The GTX 980 has 112.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 1050, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 980 is massively better than the GeForce GTX 1050.
The GeForce GTX 1050 has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 980 Palit JetStream 4GB Edition has 2048. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 1050 is 1257 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 3362. The GTX 980 having 2105 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 980 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 1050.
The GeForce GTX 1050 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 980. This means that the GeForce GTX 1050 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 980.
The GeForce GTX 1050 requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 980 Palit JetStream 4GB Edition requires 180 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GeForce GTX 1050 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 980. The GTX 980 requires 105 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 1050 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 980 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 1050.
Core Speed | 1354 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1126 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1216 MHz | |
Architecture | Pascal P107 | Maxwell GM204-400-A1 | |||
OC Potential | None | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 01 Nov 2016 | ![]() | vs | 19 Sep 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
10
|
1920x1080 | 8.1
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
2560x1440 | 5.8
|
vs | ![]() |
7.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 4.3
|
vs | ![]() |
5.9
|
Memory | 2048 MB | vs | ![]() | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1752 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1753 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 112.1GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 224.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | vs | ![]() |
2048 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | yes | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | vs | ![]() | 2048 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 60% | vs | ![]() | 100% | |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 28nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | ![]() | 128 | |
Texture Rate | 54.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 144.1 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 43.3 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 72.1 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 7680x4320 | ![]() | vs | 5120x3200 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 75 Watts | ![]() | vs | 180 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 27 Amps | ![]() | vs | 500 Watts & 42 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.5 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview The latest GeForce GTX 1050 is Nvidia's lower end graphics card, designed to compete against AMDs more affordable gaming cards, like the RX 460 or RX 470 and expected to replace the outgoing GTX 960. Architecture The Pascal Architecture aims for twice as much performance as the Maxwell Architecture and Introduces support for Second Gen HBM. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GP107-400 which has 5 SM activated and thus 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 32 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1354MHz and goes up to 1455MHz with the Boost Clock. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface, while the memory clock Operates at 3504MHz which is outstanding. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance The GTX 1050 will enable mid level graphics performance on modern AAA 2016 released games. Although there will be variations on this frame rate we expect this card to deliver around 50+ FPS on medium graphics settings at a 1080p screen resolution. Comparatively, this card will have slightly faster performance than the GTX 960. System Suggestions The GeForce GTX 1050 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1920x1080, so our recommendation would be to use 1600x900 in order to get the most out of your settings. We recommend a high-end processor such as the i5-6500 and 8GB of RAM for optimal performance. | Overview GeForce GTX 980 Palit JetStream 4GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's high-end GeForce GTX 980 4GB created by Palit. It doesn't offer overclocking out of the box. Read below to know more. Overclock Out of The Box The Clock Frequencies of both Central Unit and Operating Memory Clock Remain the Same. Cooling Solution The reference NVIDIA Single-Fan Cooling System has been replaced by Palit's Dual Fan Cooling Solution. This means the card runs much cooler under load. Power Consumption According to Palit, the Rated Board TDP is now of 180W. A 500W PSU with at least one 6-pin and one 8-pin available connectors is required. Release Price Coming Soon! Performance Coming Soon! |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |