Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R4 7310 Radeon R9 M365X 4GB
Cyberpunk 2077 1638% 438%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1490% 392%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1438% 376%
Hitman 3 2162% 600%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2346% 657%
FIFA 21 777% 171%
Far Cry 6 2415% 679%
Genshin Impact 1638% 438%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 2392% 671%
Watch Dogs Legion 1577% 419%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the AMD Radeon R4 7310.

The Radeon R4 7310 has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R4 7310. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 18.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R4 7310. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R4 7310 has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 12 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R4 7310. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 6.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R4 7310. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released less than a year after the Radeon R4 7310, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 4096 MB video memory, but the Radeon R4 7310 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R4 7310 has 128 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R4 7310 is 67 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340. The R9 M365X having 273 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R4 7310.

The Radeon R4 7310 requires 15 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 35 Watts more than the Radeon R4 7310 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M365X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R4 7310.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed800 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitecturePuma+GCN 1.0 Venus PRO
OC Potential None vs Good
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date06 May 2015vs09 Jun 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
7.7
1600x900 - vs green tick
5.9
1920x1080 - vs green tick
4.5
2560x1440 - vs green tick
3
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs4096 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth12.8GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs640
Actual Shader Performance3%vs16%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs40
Texture Rate6.4 GTexel/svs25 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs16
Pixel Rate3.2 GPixel/svs10 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power15 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A6-7310 Quad-CorevsIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1280x720vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R4 7310 is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A6-7310.

It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 800MHz, the memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 800MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 2MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Overall, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance similar to an integrated Intel HD 4200.
The card is only suited for gaming below 720p and all modern demanding games can be played at least on low settings.
Overview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-