Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 2600 Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 3085% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 4275% 2721%
Doom Eternal 2638% 1666%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1864% 1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3085% 1954%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4275% 2721%
FIFA 20 1596% 994%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4766% 3038%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 4275% 2721%
Need For Speed Heat 3085% 1954%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 2600.

The Quadro FX 1600M was released less than a year after the Radeon HD, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 256 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 1600M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 6.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 1600M is marginally better than the Radeon HD.

The Radeon HD has 120 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed500 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRV630G84M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 May 2007vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed600 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth19.2GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units120vs-
Actual Shader Performance3%vs-
Technology-vs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL2.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewATI Mobility Radeon HD 2000 series products feature ATI Avivo HD with Unified Video Decoder (UVD) technology to deliver outstanding Blu-ray disc playback1,2. This generation of ATI Mobility Radeon graphics unlock the spectacular gaming visuals and dynamics defined by Windows Vista and Microsoft DirectX 10 for The Ultimate Visual Experience. And with ATI PowerPlay 7.0 power management technology3, power consumption is reduced for long battery life and optimized performance-per-watt operation. The mid-range and performance level GPUs are the first graphics products in the industry to use an energy-efficient 65 nm process technology to achieve passive cooling and lower power consumption.The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body