Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT GeForce 8200M G
Red Dead Redemption 2 6194% 14761%
Halo: Reach 1900% 4622%
Cyberpunk 2077 8547% 20317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6194% 14761%
Doom Eternal 5312% 12678%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 8547% 20317%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 142% 472%
Grand Theft Auto VI 9518% 22608%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 8547% 20317%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 3782% 9067%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 8200M G.

The GeForce 8200M G was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD, and so the GeForce 8200M G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 8200M G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 40 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8200M G has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD is 24 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 8200M G is 3. The Radeon HD having 21 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon HD delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 8200M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed600 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRV610-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date14 May 2007vs01 Jun 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory256 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed700 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vs-
Memory Bandwidth11.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs8
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL2.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewATI Mobility Radeon HD 2000 series products feature ATI Avivo HD with Unified Video Decoder (UVD) technology to deliver outstanding Blu-ray disc playback1,2. This generation of ATI Mobility Radeon graphics unlock the spectacular gaming visuals and dynamics defined by Windows Vista and Microsoft DirectX 10 for The Ultimate Visual Experience. And with ATI PowerPlay 7.0 power management technology3, power consumption is reduced for long battery life and optimized performance-per-watt operation. The mid-range and performance level GPUs are the first graphics products in the industry to use an energy-efficient 65 nm process technology to achieve passive cooling and lower power consumption.GeForce 8400M GT is an on-board GPU part of the 8000M Series released by NVIDIA, in 2007.
Only less demanding games can be played smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body