Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Bay Trail) Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 2957% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 4100% 2721%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1786% 1167%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4100% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2957% 1954%
Doom Eternal 2529% 1666%
FIFA 20 1529% 994%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4571% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 2957% 1954%
Halo: Reach 871% 553%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Bay Trail).

The Graphics Mobile was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the Graphics Mobile is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1600M when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics Mobile does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics Mobile has 4 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Graphics Mobile transistor size technology is 58 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 1600M. This means that the Graphics Mobile is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 1600M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics Mobile should consume less power than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The HD Graphics Mobile (Bay Trail) requires 10 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 40 Watts more than the Graphics Mobile to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 1600M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Graphics Mobile.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed311 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock896 MHzvs-
ArchitectureBay Trail GT1G84M
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Ok vs -
Release Date11 Sep 2013vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs512 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs-
Actual Shader Performance1%vs-
Texture Mapping Units2vs-
Texture Rate0.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.6 GPixel/svs-

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL3.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron N2920 1.86GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Bay Trail) are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Budget Processors.

The Bay Trail Core is a cut-down Ivy Bridge GPU and includes support for DirectX 11.0, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 3.0. The DirectX 11 Performance is however very lacking due to the very limited amount of shading units.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 4 Shader Processing Units, 2 TMUs and 2 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 311MHz and goes up to 896MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 667MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Best Case Scenario, expect performance matching up the older Radeon HH 6320.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel HD Graphics Mobile (Bay Trail).
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants