Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R5 M335 4GB Radeon HD 8610G
Cyberpunk 2077 1533% 1580%
Call of Duty Warzone 1089% 1123%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1717% 1769%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1533% 1580%
Maneater 922% 951%
Valorant 17% 20%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 597% 617%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 1044% 1077%
Doom Eternal 1111% 1146%
Mafia 2: Definitive Edition 989% 1020%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R5 M335 4GB are marginally better than the AMD Radeon HD 8610G.

The R5 M335 has a 537 MHz higher core clock speed but 4 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 8610G. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the R5 M335 manages to provide 8.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R5 M335 has a 537 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 8610G and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R5 M335 providing 4.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R5 M335 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD 8610G, and so the R5 M335 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD 8610G.

The R5 M335 has 4096 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8610G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R5 M335 4GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 8610G has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R5 M335 is 291 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 8610G is 240. The R5 M335 having 51 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R5 M335 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 8610G.

The R5 M335 transistor size technology is 4 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 8610G. This means that the R5 M335 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 8610G. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the R5 M335 should consume less power than the Radeon HD 8610G.

The Radeon R5 M335 4GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 8610G requires 25 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1070 MHzvs533 MHz
Boost Clock-vs626 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Exo XTTerascale 3
OC Potential Fair vs None
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date21 Oct 2015vs23 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.2
green tick vs -
1600x900
3.7
green tick vs -
1920x1080
2.5
green tick vs green tick
2.5
2560x1440
1.9
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.3
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed1100 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth17.6GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs384
Actual Shader Performance14%vs12%
Technology28nmvs32nm
Texture Mapping Units20vs24
Texture Rate21.4 GTexel/svs12.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate8.6 GPixel/svs4.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R5 M335 4GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture.

Architecture
Radeon R5 M335 4GB Equips the GPU Codenamed Exo XT which is a GCN 1.1 GPU and thus offers Support for Feature Level DirectX 11.2 and the TrueAudio Technology.
Exo XT has 5 Compute Units Activated and thus offers 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs.

GPU
The central unit runs at 1070MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 64-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1100MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB.

Performance
The Performance of Radeon R5 M335 4GB is only Very Slightly above the Radeon R5 M330 2GB.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon HD 8610G is an integrated mobile GPU, first seen on the ultra low-voltage APU A10-5745M, based on the 32nm, Terascale 3 architecture.
It offer 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a DDR3 memory interface of either a 128-bit bus width, if the laptop system RAM's is dual-channelled, or a 64-bit bus width, if not. The central units runs at 533MHz and goes up to 626MHz, in Turbo Mode. The memory clock can operate up to 667MHz, as the max memory supported by the CPU is DDR3-1333.
Its performance depends heavily on whether or not the memory is dual-channelled. Benchmarks put its performance on level with today's middle-class GPUs such as GeForce GT 540M-GeForce GT 630M or Radeon HD 7650M/7670M. Therefore, modern demanding games can be played with medium detail.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-