Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 3300 Radeon X1050
Cyberpunk 2077 3907% 7640%
Hitman 3 5113% 9968%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3565% 6979%
The Medium 4900% 9558%
Resident Evil 8 3907% 7640%
FIFA 21 1921% 3804%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 3446% 6749%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5538% 10790%
Genshin Impact 3907% 7640%
Far Cry 6 5698% 11099%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 3300 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon X1050.

The Radeon HD 3300 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Radeon X1050. This results in the Radeon HD 3300 providing 1.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since the Radeon HD 3300 supports up to DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 3300 has a 300 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon X1050 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 3300 providing 1.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon HD 3300 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon X1050, and so the Radeon HD 3300 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon X1050.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1050 has 128 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 3300 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon HD 3300 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 3300 is 18 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon X1050 is 1. The Radeon HD 3300 having 17 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon X1050 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 3300 transistor size technology is 55 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon X1050. This means that the Radeon HD 3300 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon X1050. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 3300 should consume less power than the Radeon X1050.

The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 3300. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Radeon HD 3300.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed700 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS780DRV370
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date06 Aug 2008vs07 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs333 MHz
Memory Bus32 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs5.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs4
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology55nmvs110nm
Texture Mapping Units4vs4
Texture Rate2.8 GTexel/svs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate2.8 GPixel/svs1.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-24 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10vs9
Shader Model4.1vs2.0
Open GL3.3vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 3300 is an integrated GPU on the AMD 790GX Chipset which is based on the 55nm, second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RS780D Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 or GDDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 700MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 3300's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 3300 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 3450 (700+MHz & GDDR3 - never better due to lesser driver support) or very limited performance (300MHz & DDR2). DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture.
It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-