Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R5 7410 GeForce 320M
Red Dead Redemption 2 1683% 2278%
Cyberpunk 2077 2350% 3167%
Doom Eternal 1433% 1944%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1000% 1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1683% 2278%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2350% 3167%
FIFA 20 850% 1167%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2625% 3533%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 2350% 3167%
Need For Speed Heat 1683% 2278%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R5 7410 are noticeably better than the Nvidia GeForce 320M.

The Radeon R5 7410 has a 397 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R5 7410. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 0.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R5 7410. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R5 7410 has a 397 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 320M, but the GeForce 320M has 4 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R5 7410. As a result, the GeForce 320M exhibits a 0.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R5 7410. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R5 7410 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 320M, and so the Radeon R5 7410 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 320M when running the latest games.

The Radeon R5 7410 and the GeForce 320M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R5 7410 has 8.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 320M, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R5 7410 is marginally better than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon R5 7410 has 128 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R5 7410 is 87 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The Radeon R5 7410 having 42 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R5 7410 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon R5 7410 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 320M. This means that the Radeon R5 7410 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 320M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon R5 7410 should consume less power than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon R5 7410 requires 15 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce 320M requires 8 Watts more than the Radeon R5 7410 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 320M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R5 7410.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed847 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitecturePuma+ Carrizo-LTesla MCP89
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support Ok vs Poor
Release Date06 May 2015vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
4.2
green tick vs -
1600x900
2.9
green tick vs
2.4
1920x1080
2.1
green tick vs
1.7
2560x1440
1.5
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.1
green tick vs
0.1

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed933 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth29.9GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs48
Actual Shader Performance4%vs2%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs16
Texture Rate6.8 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs8
Pixel Rate3.4 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2304vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power15 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.4vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor APU A8-7410 Quad-CorevsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R5 7410 is an Integrated Graphics Card in the APU A8-7410 Quad-Core Processor.

Architecture
The Puma+ Architecture Succeeds the Jaguar Architecture. The Base Features and the Performance per Clock Remain Untouched. Better Performance over its Predecessor was achieved by reducing the leakage current, allowing Higher Clock Frequencies.
The GPU Codenamed Carrizo-L offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit Initially Runs at ???MHz and goes up to 847MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory: Speed
The Operating Memory Clock depends at which speed the System's RAM is running and which Memory Type is installed and is ultimately limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 933MHz.
Depending on whether or not the System's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit Memory Interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies according to the System. The GPU may reserve up to 2GB.

Performance
Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary heavily from System to System.
Best Case Scenario, expect Performance Identical to a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

System Suggestions
Radeon R5 7410 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Architecture
Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

Memory
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Features
DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body