Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R5 7410 | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1783% | 438% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1623% | 392% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 1567% | 376% |
| FIFA 21 | 850% | 171% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 2550% | 657% |
| Hitman 3 | 2350% | 600% |
| Genshin Impact | 1783% | 438% |
| Far Cry 6 | 2625% | 679% |
| World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 2600% | 671% |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 1717% | 419% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the AMD Radeon R5 7410.
The Radeon R5 7410 has a 222 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R5 7410. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 18.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R5 7410. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon R5 7410 has a 222 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 12 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R5 7410. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 6.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon R5 7410. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M365X was released less than a year after the Radeon R5 7410, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The R9 M365X has 4096 MB video memory, but the Radeon R5 7410 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The Radeon R5 7410 has 128 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R5 7410 is 87 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340. The R9 M365X having 253 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R5 7410.
The Radeon R5 7410 requires 15 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 35 Watts more than the Radeon R5 7410 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M365X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R5 7410.
| Core Speed | 847 MHz |  | vs | 625 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
| Architecture | Puma+ Carrizo-L | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | |||
| OC Potential | None | vs |
| Good | |
| Driver Support | Ok | vs | |
Great | |
| Release Date | 06 May 2015 | vs | | 09 Jun 2015 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 4.2
|
vs | |
7.7
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 2.9
|
vs | |
5.9
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 2.1
|
vs | |
4.5
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 1.5
|
vs | |
3
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 1.1
|
vs | |
2
|
|
| Memory | N/A | vs | | 4096 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 933 MHz | vs | | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | | vs | | 128 Bit |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | | GDDR5 | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 29.9GB/sec | vs | | 64GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 2048 KB | |
vs | 256 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 128 | vs | | 640 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 4% | vs | | 16% | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 8 | vs | | 40 | |
| Texture Rate | 6.8 GTexel/s | vs | | 25 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 4 | vs | | 16 | |
| Pixel Rate | 3.4 GPixel/s | vs | | 10 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2304 | | vs | 4096x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 15 Watts | | vs | 50 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | | 12.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.4 | | vs | | 4.4 |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | | yes | |
| Dedicated | no | vs | | yes | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | AMD APU A8-7410 Quad-Core | | vs | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 4 GB | | vs | 8 GB | |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | | 1600x900 | |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R5 7410 is an Integrated Graphics Card in the APU A8-7410 Quad-Core Processor. Architecture The Puma+ Architecture Succeeds the Jaguar Architecture. The Base Features and the Performance per Clock Remain Untouched. Better Performance over its Predecessor was achieved by reducing the leakage current, allowing Higher Clock Frequencies. The GPU Codenamed Carrizo-L offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit Initially Runs at ???MHz and goes up to 847MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory: Speed The Operating Memory Clock depends at which speed the System's RAM is running and which Memory Type is installed and is ultimately limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 933MHz. Depending on whether or not the System's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit Memory Interface. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies according to the System. The GPU may reserve up to 2GB. Performance Because Performance depends heavily on the Memory Bandwidth, it may vary heavily from System to System. Best Case Scenario, expect Performance Identical to a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M. System Suggestions Radeon R5 7410 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||