Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition Radeon R7 260
Red Dead Redemption 2 212% 224%
Cyberpunk 2077 328% 345%
Doom Eternal 168% 179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 212% 224%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 92% 100%
Halo: Reach 1% 3%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 328% 345%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 328% 345%
Grand Theft Auto VI 376% 395%
Need For Speed Heat 212% 224%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 260.

The R7 260X has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 260. This results in the R7 260X providing 9.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 260X has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 260 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 260X providing 0.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 260 was released less than a year after the R7 260X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 260 has 16 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is slightly better than the R7 260X.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition has 896 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260 has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653. The R7 260X having 131 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon R7 260 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition requires 85 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260. The Radeon R7 260 requires 10 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 260 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R7 260X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1030 MHzvs1000 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Bonaire XTGCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs17 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.8
green tick vs
9.7
1600x900
7.6
green tick vs
7.5
1920x1080
5.8
green tick vs
5.7
2560x1440
4.1
green tick vs
4
3840x2160
2.5
green tick vs
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs768
Actual Shader Performance38%vs31%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs48
Texture Rate57.7 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16.5 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power85 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 260X v3 PowerColor OC v4 2GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v3, created by PowerColor.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v3.
Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body