Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 183% 194%
Cyberpunk 2077 289% 304%
Doom Eternal 143% 153%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 75% 81%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 183% 194%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 289% 304%
FIFA 20 51% 57%
Grand Theft Auto VI 333% 349%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 289% 304%
Need For Speed Heat 183% 194%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition.

The R7 260X has a 117 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. This results in the R7 260X providing 31.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 260X has a 117 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 750 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R7 260X providing 1.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released less than a year after the R7 260X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R7 260X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R7 260X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R7 260X has 15.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is slightly better than the GTX 750.

The Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 895 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 786. The R7 260X having 109 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R7 260X delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition requires 105 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750. The R7 260X has been recommended a PSU with 100 Watts more than the GTX 750. The difference is significant enough that the R7 260X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1175 MHzvs1058 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1137 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Bonaire XTMaxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8
green tick vs
7.9
1920x1080
6.1
green tick vs
6
2560x1440
4.4
green tick vs
4.2
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs green tick
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1253 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth96GB/secvs80.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs512
Actual Shader Performance43%vs38%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs32
Texture Rate65.8 GTexel/svs33.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate18.8 GPixel/svs16.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power105 Watts-
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs400 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 260X v2 MSI OC v2 2GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by MSI.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 1175MHz, instead of 1000MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
The Frame Buffer was doubled to 2GB.
However, because the Graphics Card itself is not Powerful enough to work under circumstances in which 2GB are needed, such as 1080p, it is mostly a gimmick.

Cooling Solution
Propeller Blade Technology: 20% more airflow, 50% larger cooling area and Large 10CM fan.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 8% performance over the reference Radeon R7 260X v2.
GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1058MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1137MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 4% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus this card is slightly faster than Radeon R7 260X.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body