Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 260X VisionTek OC 2GB Edition GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 173% 180%
Cyberpunk 2077 276% 285%
Doom Eternal 135% 141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 173% 180%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 69% 73%
Halo: Reach 13% 11%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 276% 285%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 276% 285%
Grand Theft Auto VI 318% 329%
Need For Speed Heat 173% 180%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260X VisionTek OC 2GB Edition are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition.

The R7 260X has a 235 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GTX 560. This results in the R7 260X providing 13.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 260X has a 235 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 560, but the GTX 560 has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 260X. As a result, the GTX 560 exhibits a 11 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 260X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 260X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 560, and so the R7 260X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 560.

The R7 260X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GTX 560 has 28.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 560 is slightly better than the R7 260X.

The Radeon R7 260X VisionTek OC 2GB Edition has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition has 336. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 883 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 560 is 622. The R7 260X having 261 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 560 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The R7 260X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 560. This means that the R7 260X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 560. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the R7 260X should consume less power than the GTX 560.

The Radeon R7 260X VisionTek OC 2GB Edition requires 115 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition requires 150 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 560. The GTX 560 requires 35 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 560 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 260X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1160 MHzvs925 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Bonaire XTXFermi GF114-325-A1
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs19 May 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
8.1
green tick vs
7.9
1920x1080
6.2
green tick vs
6.1
2560x1440
4.5
green tick vs
4.1
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1650 MHzvs1050 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth105.6GB/secvs134.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs336
Actual Shader Performance42%vs30%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs56
Texture Rate65 GTexel/svs51.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate18.6 GPixel/svs29.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power115 Wattsvs150 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-2300 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 260X VisionTek OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X, created by VisionTek.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit has been increased from 1100MHz to 1160MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock has been increased from 1625MHz to 1650MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System was replaced by VisionTek's Dual Fan Cooling Solution.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 3% Performance Boost over the reference Radeon R7 260X.
Overview
GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 560, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 925MHz, instead of 810MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1050MHz, instead of 1002MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
DirectCU II: Copper heat pipes in direct contact with the GPU to speed up heat dissipation for over 20% cooler performance, DirectCU II takes cooling further with twin 80mm fans for doubled airflow.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 9% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 560.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body