Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 260X v3 GeForce GTX 770
Cyberpunk 2077 332% 99%
Red Dead Redemption 2 215% 45%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 94% 11%
Halo: Reach 0% 54%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 332% 99%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 215% 45%
FIFA 20 68% 23%
Doom Eternal 171% 24%
Grand Theft Auto VI 381% 121%
Need For Speed Heat 215% 45%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X v3.

The GeForce GTX 770 has a 46 MHz higher core clock speed and 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 260X. This results in the GeForce GTX 770 providing 77.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 770 has a 46 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 260X. This results in the GeForce GTX 770 providing 17.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 260X was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 770, and so the R7 260X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 770.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 and the GeForce GTX 770 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce GTX 770 has 144.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 260X, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 770 is massively better than the R7 260X.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 has 896 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 762 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 770 is 1667. The GeForce GTX 770 having 905 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 770 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 260X.

The Radeon R7 260X v3 requires 85 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770 requires 230 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R7 260X and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 770. The GeForce GTX 770 requires 145 Watts more than the R7 260X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 260X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs1046 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Bonaire XTKepler GK104-425-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date05 Feb 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.8
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7.6
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
5.8
vs green tick
8.6
2560x1440
4.1
vs green tick
6.3
3840x2160
2.5
vs green tick
4.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs224.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units896vs1536
Actual Shader Performance37%vs80%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs128
Texture Rate56 GTexel/svs133.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs33.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x3112vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power85 Wattsvs230 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs550 Watts & 37 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4150 3.5GHzvsIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 260X v3 is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
Radeon R7 260X v3 Equips a GPU Codenamed Bonaire XT which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and was previously used on Radeon 7790.
Bonaire XT has 14 Compute Units activated and thus offers 896 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1000MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1250Hz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. This would be useful were the Graphics Card suited for 1080p Gaming, which is not the case.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 100W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Radeon R7 260X v3 is the slowest of all Radeon R7 260X Variants and Delivers Performance Below the Older Radeon HD 7790.

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 260X v3 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants

Title

Body