Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R7 360 v3 | Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition |
Hitman 3 | 308% | 332% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 214% | 232% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 187% | 204% |
FIFA 21 | 58% | 68% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 342% | 368% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 178% | 194% |
Resident Evil 8 | 214% | 232% |
Genshin Impact | 214% | 232% |
Far Cry 6 | 354% | 381% |
The Medium | 292% | 315% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 360 v3 are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition.
The R7 360 has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 5850, but the HD 5850 has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 360. As a result, the HD 5850 exhibits a 1.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 360. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R7 360 has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 5850, but the HD 5850 has 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 360. As a result, the HD 5850 exhibits a 6.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 360. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R7 360 was released over three years more recently than the HD 5850, and so the R7 360 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 5850 when running the latest games.
The R7 360 has 1024 MB more video memory than the HD 5850, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The HD 5850 has 16 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 360, which means that the memory performance of the HD 5850 is slightly better than the R7 360.
The Radeon R7 360 v3 has 768 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition has 1440. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 360 is 685 and the actual shader performance of the HD 5850 is 522. The R7 360 having 163 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 5850 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The R7 360 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 5850. This means that the R7 360 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 5850.
The Radeon R7 360 v3 requires 100 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition requires 151 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 360 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 5850. The HD 5850 requires 51 Watts more than the R7 360 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 5850 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 360.
Core Speed | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | 725 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.1 Tobago PRO | Terascale 2 Cypress PRO | |||
OC Potential | Fair | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 18 Jun 2015 | ![]() | vs | 30 Sep 2009 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.8
|
![]() |
vs | 7.4
|
|
1920x1080 | 6
|
![]() |
vs | 5.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 4.3
|
![]() |
vs | 3.9
|
|
3840x2160 | 2.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1000 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 112GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 128GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 768 | vs | ![]() | 1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 33% | ![]() | vs | 25% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 48 | vs | ![]() | 72 | |
Texture Rate | 50.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 52.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 16.8 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 23.2 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 100 Watts | ![]() | vs | 151 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 33 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts & 37 Amps |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4370 3.8GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-860 Quad 2.80GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R7 360 v3 is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture. Architecture Radeon R7 360 Equips a GPU Codenamed Tobago PRO which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and can be considered a rename of the Bonaire PRO previously used on Radeon R7 260. Tobago PRO has 12 Compute Units activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is clocked at 1050MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1750Hz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. This would be useful were the Graphics Card suited for 1080p Gaming, which is not the case. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 100W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector. Performance Radeon R7 360 v3 is the Fastest of all Radeon R7 360 Variants and Delivers Performance Almost Similar to Radeon HD 7790. System Suggestions Radeon R7 360 v3 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Middle-Class Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's High-End RRadeon HD 5850, created by MSI. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit runs at the same speed. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer Remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System is now the Twin Frozr II Thermal Design, which is 12? cooler compared to reference cooling. Performance Without any overclocking out of the box, Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon HD 5850. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |