Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 202% 183%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 176% 158%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 167% 150%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 167% 150%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 146% 130%
FIFA 21 52% 43%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 333% 305%
Watch Dogs Legion 191% 173%
Genshin Impact 202% 183%
Grand Theft Auto VI 325% 298%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 165 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 7.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 165 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 11.1 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the GTX 750 Ti is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.

The GTX 750 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GTX 460 has 42.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is noticeably better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 575 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 937. The GTX 750 Ti having 362 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 460 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 750 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the GTX 750 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition requires 160 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition requires 60 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti. The GTX 460 requires 100 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed855 MHzvs1020 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1085 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF104-300-KB-A1Maxwell GM107-400-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date10 Sep 2010vs01 Nov 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
vs green tick
8
1920x1080
6.1
vs green tick
6.4
2560x1440
4.1
vs green tick
4.5
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.8

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1005 MHzvs1350 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.6GB/secvs86.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs640
Actual Shader Performance28%vs45%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs40
Texture Rate47.9 GTexel/svs40.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate27.4 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power160 Wattsvs60 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 24 Ampsvs400 Watts & 29 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 460, created by Point of View.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 855MHz, instead of 675MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was increased from 900MHz to 1005MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 17% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 460.
Overview
GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GT 750 Ti, created by MSI.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit runs at the same speed.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by MSI's Dual Fan Cooling Solution, meaning the Graphics Card is silent under load.

Performance
Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GT 750 Ti.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-