Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 202% 399%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 176% 356%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 167% 341%
Watch Dogs Legion 191% 381%
Godfall 390% 710%
FIFA 21 52% 152%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 167% 341%
Grand Theft Auto VI 325% 602%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 333% 615%
Genshin Impact 202% 399%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition.

The R7 250 has a 195 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 22.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R7 250. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R7 250 has a 195 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 24 more Render Output Units than the R7 250. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 19 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R7 250. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 250 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the R7 250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.

The R7 250 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GTX 460 has 55 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 250, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is much better than the R7 250.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 575 and the actual shader performance of the R7 250 is 359. The GTX 460 having 216 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 460 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 250.

The R7 250 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the R7 250 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition requires 160 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition requires 65 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 250. The GTX 460 requires 95 Watts more than the R7 250 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R7 250.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed855 MHzvs1050 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1100 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF104-300-KB-A1GCN 1.1 Oland XT
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date10 Sep 2010vs09 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs
5.7
1920x1080
6.1
green tick vs
4.7
2560x1440
4.1
green tick vs
3.1
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.1

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1005 MHzvs1150 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.6GB/secvs73.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs384
Actual Shader Performance28%vs17%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs24
Texture Rate47.9 GTexel/svs25.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs8
Pixel Rate27.4 GPixel/svs8.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power160 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 24 Ampsvs400 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 460, created by Point of View.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 855MHz, instead of 675MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was increased from 900MHz to 1005MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 17% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 460.
Radeon R7 250 Gigabyte OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon R7 250 2GB.

This edition comes with a special 10cnm fan, which will reduce the card's temperature and comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was increased from 1000MHz to 1050MHz, while the Boost clock is now of 1100MHz.

Benchmarks indicate a 3% performance boost over the standard edition.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-