Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 293% 304%
Red Dead Redemption 2 186% 194%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 76% 81%
Halo: Reach 9% 7%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 293% 304%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 186% 194%
FIFA 20 52% 57%
Doom Eternal 146% 153%
Grand Theft Auto VI 337% 349%
Need For Speed Heat 186% 194%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 203 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 14 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 203 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 460, but the GTX 460 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the GTX 460 exhibits a 10.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released over three years more recently than the GTX 460, and so the GTX 750 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 460 when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition and the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 460 has 48.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 460 is noticeably better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 575 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 786. The GTX 750 having 211 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 460 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the GTX 750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GTX 750 should consume less power than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition requires 160 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750. The GTX 460 has been recommended a PSU with 50 Watts more than the GTX 750. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed855 MHzvs1058 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1137 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF104-300-KB-A1Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date10 Sep 2010vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs green tick
7.9
1920x1080
6.1
green tick vs
6
2560x1440
4.1
vs green tick
4.2
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1005 MHzvs1253 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.6GB/secvs80.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs512
Actual Shader Performance28%vs38%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs32
Texture Rate47.9 GTexel/svs33.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate27.4 GPixel/svs16.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power160 Watts-
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 24 Ampsvs400 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 460, created by Point of View.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 855MHz, instead of 675MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was increased from 900MHz to 1005MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 17% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 460.
GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1058MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1137MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 4% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus this card is slightly faster than Radeon R7 260X.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body