Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire
Cyberpunk 2077 202% 183%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 176% 158%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 167% 150%
Watch Dogs Legion 191% 173%
Godfall 390% 359%
FIFA 21 52% 43%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 167% 150%
Grand Theft Auto VI 325% 298%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 333% 305%
Genshin Impact 202% 183%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition.

The GTX 460 has a 55 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7750, but the HD 7750 has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 460. As a result, the HD 7750 exhibits a 3.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 460. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 460 has a 55 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 7750 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 460 providing 1.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 7750 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 460, and so the HD 7750 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 460.

The HD 7750 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 7750 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 7750 has 15.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 460, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7750 is slightly better than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 575 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7750 is 696. The HD 7750 having 121 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 7750 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 460.

The HD 7750 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the HD 7750 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition requires 160 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire requires 110 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 7750. The GTX 460 requires 50 Watts more than the HD 7750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the HD 7750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed855 MHzvs800 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF104-300-KB-A1GCN 1.0 Cape Verde PRO (x2)
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date10 Sep 2010vs01 Feb 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
6.1
vs green tick
6.3
2560x1440
4.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1005 MHzvs1125 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.6GB/secvs144GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs1024
Actual Shader Performance28%vs33%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs64
Texture Rate47.9 GTexel/svs51.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate27.4 GPixel/svs25.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power160 Wattsvs110 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 24 Ampsvs500 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 460, created by Point of View.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 855MHz, instead of 675MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was increased from 900MHz to 1005MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 17% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 460.
Radeon HD 7750 Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon HD 7750 put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon HD 7750 to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up around 60% better a single Radeon HD 7750 performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon HD 7750. Expect this combination to draw up to 110 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-