Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition Quadro K5000
Cyberpunk 2077 202% 118%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 176% 99%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 167% 93%
FIFA 21 52% 10%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 167% 93%
Watch Dogs Legion 191% 110%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 333% 212%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 186% 106%
Grand Theft Auto VI 325% 206%
Genshin Impact 202% 118%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K5000 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition.

The GTX 460 has a 149 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K5000, but the Quadro K5000 has 72 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 460. As a result, the Quadro K5000 exhibits a 42.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 460. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 460 has a 149 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K5000 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 460 providing 4.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Quadro K5000 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 460, and so the Quadro K5000 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 460.

The Quadro K5000 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 460, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K5000 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K5000 has 44.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 460, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K5000 is noticeably better than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K5000 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 460 is 575 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K5000 is 1084. The Quadro K5000 having 509 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K5000 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 460.

The Quadro K5000 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 460. This means that the Quadro K5000 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 460.

The GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition requires 160 Watts to run and the Quadro K5000 requires 122 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 460 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro K5000. The GTX 460 requires 38 Watts more than the Quadro K5000 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 460 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Quadro K5000.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed855 MHzvs706 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureFermi GF104-300-KB-A1Kepler GK104
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date10 Sep 2010vs01 Aug 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
6.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440
4.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1005 MHzvs1350 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth128.6GB/secvs172.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs1536
Actual Shader Performance28%vs52%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs128
Texture Rate47.9 GTexel/svs90.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate27.4 GPixel/svs22.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power160 Wattsvs122 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 24 Ampsvs500 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-760 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 460 Point of View TGT Beast 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 460, created by Point of View.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 855MHz, instead of 675MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock was increased from 900MHz to 1005MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 17% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 460.
Quadro K5000 is a high-end professional card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.

It's based on the Kepler GK104 GPU and offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 11350MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 122 Watts.

Despite exhibiting similarities to GeForce GTX 680, due to being under-clocked and because Quadro K5000's drivers are only certified for professional applications only, its gaming performance is similar to GeForce GTX 760.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-