Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 207% 220%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 181% 192%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 172% 183%
Watch Dogs Legion 197% 208%
FIFA 21 55% 61%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 172% 183%
Godfall 399% 419%
Grand Theft Auto VI 333% 350%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 341% 358%
Genshin Impact 207% 220%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 260X, but the R7 260X has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the R7 260X exhibits a 23.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 260X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 0.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released less than a year after the R7 260X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The R7 260X has 16 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is slightly better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition has 896. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 795 and the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784. The GTX 750 having 11 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R7 260X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X. The R7 260X requires 50 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R7 260X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1072 MHzvs1030 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-300-A2GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date10 Mar 2014vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs
9.9
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs
7.7
1920x1080
6
green tick vs
5.9
2560x1440
4.2
green tick vs green tick
4.2
3840x2160
3.2
green tick vs
2.5

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs896
Actual Shader Performance38%vs38%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs56
Texture Rate34.3 GTexel/svs57.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate17.2 GPixel/svs16.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs105 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs500 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 750 Galaxy Slim OC 1GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GTX 750, created by Galaxy.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit is now of 1072MHz, instead of 1020MHz, while the Boost Clock achieves 1150MHz, instead of 1085MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Memory: Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 5% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 750.
Overview
Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-