Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition GeForce GTX 660 Zotac AMP Edition
Halo: Reach 167% 35%
Cyberpunk 2077 1053% 183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 739% 106%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 418% 27%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 739% 106%
Doom Eternal 622% 77%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1053% 183%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1182% 215%
FIFA 20 347% 10%
Need For Speed Heat 739% 106%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Zotac AMP Edition are massively better than the AMD Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition.

The GTX 660 has a 316 MHz higher core clock speed and 60 more Texture Mapping Units than the R7 240. This results in the GTX 660 providing 69.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 660 has a 316 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the R7 240. This results in the GTX 660 providing 19.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R7 240 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 660, and so the R7 240 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 660.

The R7 240 has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 660, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GTX 660 has superior memory performance.

The GTX 660 has 137.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R7 240, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 660 is massively better than the R7 240.

The Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 660 Zotac AMP Edition has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the R7 240 is 212 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 660 is 1067. The GTX 660 having 855 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 660 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R7 240.

The Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition requires 35 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 660 Zotac AMP Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the R7 240.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed730 MHzvs1046 MHz
Boost Clock780 MHzvs1111 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Oland PROKepler GK106-400-A1
OC Potential Good vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs01 Sep 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
vs green tick
9.1
1920x1080
3.1
vs green tick
7.2
2560x1440
2.3
vs green tick
5.2
3840x2160
1.5
vs green tick
3.5

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs1652 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs192 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs158.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 384 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs960
Actual Shader Performance10%vs51%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units20vs80
Texture Rate14.6 GTexel/svs83.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs24
Pixel Rate5.8 GPixel/svs25.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power35 Watts-
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 27 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i5-3470 3.2GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 240 XFX Core Low Profile 4GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Middle-Class Radeon R7 240, created by XFX.

Overclock: Central Unit
None.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.


Cooling Solution
XFX Ghost Thermal 2.0 Technology: floating heatsink with open airflow between the PCB and the cover so that air can quickly ventilate off the card while simultaneously cooling the core process and the components. We've also made major advances from our first generation which includes a heat tested light weight plastic to create an overall lighter thermal which reduces the physical strain on your GPU.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate no Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 240.
GeForce GTX 660 Zotac AMP Edition a special edition of GeForce GTX 660.
The new features include a new cooling system and in terms of overclocking, the base-clock was increased from 980MHz to 1046MHz and the boost clock can now reach 1111MHz, instead of 1033MHz. The memory clock was raised to 1652MHz.
Benchmarks indicate a 5.5% performance when compared to the reference card.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body