Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop | Radeon HD 6450 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1313% | 1955% |
Hitman 3 | 1738% | 2573% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1192% | 1779% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1313% | 1955% |
FIFA 21 | 613% | 936% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1888% | 2791% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 1150% | 1718% |
The Medium | 1663% | 2464% |
Genshin Impact | 1313% | 1955% |
Far Cry 6 | 1944% | 2873% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 6450.
The Radeon HD 6450 has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Graphics 510. This results in the Radeon HD 6450 providing 2.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon HD 6450 has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed than the Graphics 510 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 6450 providing 1.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Graphics 510 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon HD 6450, and so the Graphics 510 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon HD 6450 when running the latest games.
The Radeon HD 6450 has 512 MB video memory, but the Graphics 510 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The HD Graphics 510 Desktop has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6450 has 160. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 510 is 101 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 6450 is 50. The Graphics 510 having 51 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Graphics 510 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 6450.
The Graphics 510 transistor size technology is 26 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 6450. This means that the Graphics 510 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 6450.
The HD Graphics 510 Desktop requires 47 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 6450 requires 18 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Graphics 510 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon HD 6450. The Graphics 510 requires 29 Watts more than the Radeon HD 6450 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Graphics 510 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 6450.
Core Speed | 350 MHz | vs | ![]() | 625 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Skylake GT1 | Terascale 2 Caicos PRO | |||
OC Potential | None | vs |
![]() | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 01 Sep 2015 | ![]() | vs | 07 Apr 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 5.1
|
![]() |
vs | 3.6
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 3.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.6
|
|
1920x1080 | 2.4
|
![]() |
vs | 2
|
|
2560x1440 | 1.6
|
![]() |
vs | 1.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.1
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | N/A | vs | ![]() | 512 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1067 MHz | ![]() | vs | 800 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | 64 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR4 | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 34.1GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 25.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 128 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 12 | vs | ![]() | 160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 5% | ![]() | vs | 2% | |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 |
Texture Rate | 2.8 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 5 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
Pixel Rate | 1.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 2.5 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 47 Watts | vs | ![]() | 18 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 300 Watts & 22 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Celeron G440 1.6GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1366x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Skylake Processors. Architecture The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with the older Intel HD Graphics 4400. System Suggestions Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview Radeon HD 6450 is an entry-level Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Terascale Architecture. Architecture The Second variant of the Terascale 2 Architecture is still manufactured with a 40nm technology and despite allowing more Stream Cores, their design remains more or less the same compared to the first variant. GPU It equips a GPU codenamed Caicos PRO which has 2 Compute Units activated and thus offers 160 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Operates at 625MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 512MB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 64-bit memory interface. The memory clock operates at 800MHz. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. Features DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for HD3D, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies. Cooling Solution The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 18W, it requires at least a 300W PSU and it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance only slightly below of a GeForce GT 520. System Suggestions We recommend a modest processor (Intel Celeron) and 4GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 6450. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants |