Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop | Radeon R5 235 |
Hitman 3 | 1738% | 2700% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1313% | 2052% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 1192% | 1869% |
Resident Evil 8 | 1313% | 2052% |
FIFA 21 | 613% | 986% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1888% | 2929% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 1150% | 1805% |
Genshin Impact | 1313% | 2052% |
Far Cry 6 | 1944% | 3014% |
The Medium | 1663% | 2586% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R5 235.
The Radeon R5 235 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Graphics 510. This results in the Radeon R5 235 providing 3.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon R5 235 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed than the Graphics 510 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R5 235 providing 1.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Graphics 510 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R5 235, and so the Graphics 510 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R5 235.
The Radeon R5 235 has 1024 MB video memory, but the Graphics 510 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The HD Graphics 510 Desktop has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R5 235 has 160. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 510 is 101 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R5 235 is 62. The Graphics 510 having 39 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Graphics 510 delivers a slightly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R5 235.
The Graphics 510 transistor size technology is 26 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon R5 235. This means that the Graphics 510 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon R5 235.
The HD Graphics 510 Desktop requires 47 Watts to run and the Radeon R5 235 requires 35 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Graphics 510 and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the Radeon R5 235. The Graphics 510 requires 12 Watts more than the Radeon R5 235 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Graphics 510 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R5 235.
Core Speed | 350 MHz | vs | ![]() | 775 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Skylake GT1 | Terascale 2 Caicos XT | |||
OC Potential | None | vs |
![]() | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 01 Sep 2015 | ![]() | vs | 21 Dec 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 5.1
|
![]() |
vs | 3.6
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 3.5
|
![]() |
vs | 2.6
|
|
1920x1080 | 2.4
|
![]() |
vs | 1.9
|
|
2560x1440 | 1.6
|
![]() |
vs | 1.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 1.1
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | N/A | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1067 MHz | ![]() | vs | 900 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | 64 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR4 | ![]() | vs | DDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 34.1GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 14.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | 128 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 12 | vs | ![]() | 160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 5% | ![]() | vs | 3% | |
Technology | 14nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 |
Texture Rate | 2.8 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 6.2 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 |
Pixel Rate | 1.4 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 3.1 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 47 Watts | vs | ![]() | 35 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 300 Watts & 20 Amps | ![]() | vs | 350 Watts & 26 Amps |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Pentium G4400 3.3GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Celeron G1630 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | vs | 1024x768 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Skylake Processors. Architecture The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with the older Intel HD Graphics 4400. System Suggestions Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview Radeon R5 235 is an OEM only, entry-level Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Terascale Architecture. Architecture The Second variant of the Terascale 2 Architecture is still manufactured with a 40nm technology and despite allowing more Stream Cores, their design remains more or less the same compared to the first variant. GPU It equips a GPU codenamed Caicos XT which has 2 Compute Units activated and thus offers 160 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Operates at 775MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The memory clock operates at 533MHz. Features DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for HD3D, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, PowerPlay and other technologies. Cooling Solution The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 35W, it requires at least a 350W PSU and it relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power, meaning no extra connectors are required. Performance Radeon R5 235 is essentially a fast Radeon HD 6450 v3. Gaming benchmarks put its performance around of a GeForce GT 520. System Suggestions We recommend a modest processor (Intel Celeron) and 2GB of RAM for a system with Radeon R5 235. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - |