Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop Radeon R7 250X
Red Dead Redemption 2 1238% 312%
Cyberpunk 2077 1738% 465%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 725% 154%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1738% 465%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1238% 312%
Doom Eternal 1050% 254%
FIFA 20 613% 119%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1944% 529%
Need For Speed Heat 1238% 312%
Halo: Reach 325% 31%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250X are massively better than the Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 600 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics 510. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 35.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 600 MHz higher core clock speed and 12 more Render Output Units than the Graphics 510. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 13.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Graphics 510 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R7 250X, and so the Graphics 510 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R7 250X.

The Radeon R7 250X has 2048 MB video memory, but the Graphics 510 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD Graphics 510 Desktop has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 250X has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 510 is 101 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 250X is 517. The Radeon R7 250X having 416 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R7 250X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Graphics 510.

The Graphics 510 transistor size technology is 14 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon R7 250X. This means that the Graphics 510 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon R7 250X.

The HD Graphics 510 Desktop requires 47 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 250X requires 80 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Graphics 510 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 250X. The Radeon R7 250X requires 33 Watts more than the Graphics 510 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon R7 250X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Graphics 510.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs950 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs-
ArchitectureSkylake GT1GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date01 Sep 2015vs10 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.1
vs green tick
8.8
1600x900
3.5
vs green tick
6.6
1920x1080
2.4
vs green tick
5.1
2560x1440
1.6
vs green tick
3.4
3840x2160
1.1
vs green tick
2.2

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs1125 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs72GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units12vs640
Actual Shader Performance5%vs25%
Technology14nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs40
Texture Rate2.8 GTexel/svs38 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs16
Pixel Rate1.4 GPixel/svs15.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power47 Wattsvs80 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs450 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium G4400 3.3GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Skylake Processors.

Architecture
The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with the older Intel HD Graphics 4400.

System Suggestions
Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon R7 250X is a fast-middle-class Graphics Card based on the Graphics Core Next architecture. It offers the Cape Verde XT GPU.
The Cape Verde XT Core is a GCN 1.1 GPU and was first seen on Radeon HD 7770 and then re-used in the OEM only Radeon HD 8760.
It offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bits memory interface of fast GDDR5.
Radeon R7 250X comes clocked at 950MHz (though there might be some 1GHz versions) and has its operating memory clock set at 1125MHz. The rated TDP board is of 80W and the release price around $99.
This card should come in 1GB and 2GB versions, though both will offer the same performance.
Its performance has proven to be exactly like Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition (if clocked at 1GHz) and thus this card is not suited for 1080p gaming but it can handle 720p with ease. The 950MHz versions will be around 3% slower.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants

Title

Body