Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop Radeon HD 4650 Asus Low Profile Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 1313% 1229%
Hitman 3 1738% 1629%
Resident Evil 8 1313% 1229%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1192% 1116%
FIFA 21 613% 571%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1888% 1771%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1150% 1076%
Genshin Impact 1313% 1229%
Far Cry 6 1944% 1824%
The Medium 1663% 1559%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4650 Asus Low Profile Edition are very slightly better than the Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop.

The HD 4650 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics 510. This results in the HD 4650 providing 16.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD 4650 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the Graphics 510. This results in the HD 4650 providing 3.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Graphics 510 was released over three years more recently than the HD 4650, and so the Graphics 510 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 4650 when running the latest games.

The HD 4650 has 1024 MB video memory, but the Graphics 510 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD Graphics 510 Desktop has 12 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 4650 Asus Low Profile Edition has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 510 is 101 and the actual shader performance of the HD 4650 is 125. The HD 4650 having 24 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Graphics 510 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Graphics 510 transistor size technology is 41 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 4650. This means that the Graphics 510 is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 4650. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics 510 should consume less power than the HD 4650.

The HD Graphics 510 Desktop requires 47 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 4650 Asus Low Profile Edition requires 48 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Graphics 510 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the HD 4650. The HD 4650 requires 1 Watts more than the Graphics 510 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the HD 4650 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Graphics 510.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs-
ArchitectureSkylake GT1R700 RV730PRO
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date01 Sep 2015vs01 Sep 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.1
green tick vs -
1600x900
3.5
vs green tick
3.9
1920x1080
2.4
vs green tick
2.7
2560x1440
1.6
vs green tick
1.8
3840x2160
1.1
vs green tick
1.3

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed1067 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR4vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth34.1GB/secvs12.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units12vs320
Actual Shader Performance5%vs6%
Technology14nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs32
Texture Rate2.8 GTexel/svs19.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs8
Pixel Rate1.4 GPixel/svs4.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power47 Wattsvs48 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 20 Ampsvs400 Watts & 24 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.1vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.4vs3.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium G4400 3.3GHzvsIntel Core 2 Duo E4700 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1280x720

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's Skylake Processors.

Architecture
The Skylake Core includes support for DirectX 12.1, OpenCL 2.0 and OpenGL 4.4. Additionally, it also supports DDR4 Memory.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT1 which offers 12 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 350MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1.7GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 1067MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance almost on level with the older Intel HD Graphics 4400.

System Suggestions
Intel HD Graphics 510 Desktop is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Decent Processor and 4GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon HD 4650 Asus Low Profile Edition is a special edition of the middle-class Radeon HD 4650.
This edition comes optimized for lower noise production but has no overclocking out of the box and so it performs like any other Radeon HD 4650.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-