Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI | FirePro S9150 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 36% | 62% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 25% | 48% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 20% | 44% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 92% | 128% |
FIFA 21 | 31% | 18% |
Genshin Impact | 36% | 62% |
Far Cry 6 | 97% | 135% |
Hitman 3 | 77% | 111% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 31% | 57% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 95% | 133% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI are noticeably better than the AMD FirePro S9150.
The GTX 950 has a 124 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150, but the FirePro S9150 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 950. As a result, the FirePro S9150 exhibits a 60.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 950. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 950 has a 124 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 950 providing 7.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 950 was released over a year more recently than the FirePro S9150, and so the GTX 950 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FirePro S9150.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The FirePro S9150 has 12288 MB more video memory than the GTX 950, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9150 has 108.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 950, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is massively better than the GTX 950.
The GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI has 1536 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro S9150 has 2816. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 950 is 2463 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534. The FirePro S9150 having 71 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9150 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 950.
The GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI requires 180 Watts to run and the FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 950. The FirePro S9150 requires 55 Watts more than the GTX 950 to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9150 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 950.
Core Speed | 1024 MHz | ![]() | vs | 900 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM206-250 (x2) | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Good |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 20 Aug 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Aug 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 9.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 6.8
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 5.2
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 4096 MB | vs | ![]() | 16384 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1653 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1250 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 211.6GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 320GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1536 | vs | ![]() | 2816 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 96 | vs | ![]() | 176 | |
Texture Rate | 98.3 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 158.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 65.5 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 57.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Power | 180 Watts | ![]() | vs | 235 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 450 Watts & 30 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.2 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4460 3.2GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | 16 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | vs | ![]() | 5760x1600 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 950 2GB put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology. Architecture The Second variant of the Maxwell Architecture, despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, has an extremely large L2 Cache and features a Third Generation Delta Color Compression which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient. GPU It consists of 2 GPUs codenamed GM206-250 which, together, offer 1536 Shader Processing Units, 96 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1127MHz and goes up to 1178MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory Each GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1653MHz. Power Consumption Power Consumption is around 180W. Performance Gaming benchmarks prove that at 1920x1080, the best suited resolution, GeForce GTX 950 2GB SLI is only around 5% slower than the older GeForce GTX 780, meaning a single GeForce GTX 970 is still considerably faster. System Suggestions We recommend a Performance Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ. Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |