Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Quadro K4000M
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 409%
Hitman 3 600% 562%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 365%
Resident Evil 8 438% 409%
FIFA 21 171% 157%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 616%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 350%
The Medium 571% 535%
Genshin Impact 438% 409%
Far Cry 6 679% 636%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K4000M are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.

The R9 M365X has a 24 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4000M, but the Quadro K4000M has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the Quadro K4000M exhibits a 23.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 24 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4000M, but the Quadro K4000M has 16 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the Quadro K4000M exhibits a 9.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the Quadro K4000M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro K4000M when running the latest games.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB and the Quadro K4000M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro K4000M has 25.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K4000M is slightly better than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K4000M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4000M is 577. The Quadro K4000M having 237 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K4000M delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the Quadro K4000M requires 100 Watts. The Quadro K4000M requires 50 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K4000M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs601 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROKepler GK104
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Jun 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs89.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs960
Actual Shader Performance16%vs28%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs80
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs48.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs19.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs100 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Quadro K4000M is a high-end business card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
Technically the successor to the previous Quadro 4000M, it's based on the Kepler GK104 (despite the SPU count) and offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 700MHz.
Quadro K4000M's drivers are certified for professional applications. Therefore, and also because it's underclocked, its performance lies closer to GeForce GTX 675M despite the similarities to GeForce GTX 675MX.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-