Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Mobility Radeon HD 565v
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 1737%
Hitman 3 600% 2290%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 1580%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 1526%
FIFA 21 171% 827%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 2485%
Far Cry 6 679% 2559%
Genshin Impact 438% 1737%
Battlefield 6 600% 2290%
Resident Evil 8 438% 1737%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 565v.

The Radeon HD has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 3.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon HD. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 8 more Render Output Units than the Radeon HD. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 4.6 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Radeon HD. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the Radeon HD, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon HD when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 3072 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 38.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is noticeably better than the Radeon HD.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Mobility Radeon HD 565v has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD is 140. The R9 M365X having 200 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD.

The R9 M365X transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD. This means that the R9 M365X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the Mobility Radeon HD 565v requires 35 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 15 Watts more than the Radeon HD to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs675 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROM96 XT
OC Potential Good vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs05 May 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs320
Actual Shader Performance16%vs7%
Technology28nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs32
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs21.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs5.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs35 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.4vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Mobility Radeon HD 565v is a middle-class GPU based on the 55nm, Terascale 1 architecture and therefore not related to other Mobility HD 5000 Series GPUs.
It's based on the M96 XT Core and offers 320 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on 128-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. The central unit runs at 675MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 800MHz. It consumes no more than 35 Watt.
Benchmarks indicate modern demanding games of 2007-2010, such as Crysis, BF2 and Metro 2033 were playable at medium settings smoothly, using a 1024x768 resolution. Therefore, today's modern demanding games should be playable on the medium preset, using a 1024x768 resolution and extremely demanding modern games such as Crysis 3 on the lowest preset.
Its therefore a higher-clocked Mobility Radeon HD 5165 and should be a bit faster. However, as based on the Terascale 1 architecture, DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-