Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce GTX 560M
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 465%
Hitman 3 600% 635%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 417%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 400%
FIFA 21 171% 185%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 695%
Far Cry 6 679% 718%
Genshin Impact 438% 465%
Battlefield 6 600% 635%
Resident Evil 8 438% 465%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M.

The GeForce GTX 560M has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 560M. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 0.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GTX 560M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 560M has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GeForce GTX 560M providing 8.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 560M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 560M when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 2560 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 560M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 560M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is marginally better than the GeForce GTX 560M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 560M has 192. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 560M is 298. The R9 M365X having 42 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 560M.

The R9 M365X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 560M. This means that the R9 M365X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 560M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the R9 M365X should consume less power than the GeForce GTX 560M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 560M requires 75 Watts. The GeForce GTX 560M requires 25 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 560M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs775 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROFermi GF116
OC Potential Good vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs30 May 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
vs green tick
8.1
1600x900
5.9
vs green tick
6
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs
4.4
2560x1440
3
green tick vs
2.7
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1536 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs625 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs60GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 384 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs192
Actual Shader Performance16%vs14%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs32
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs24.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs24
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs18.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i5-2540M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 560M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Fermi Architecture.

Architecture
The Fermi Architecture is manufactured with a 40nm technology and uses a technique known as Hot Clocking: The Shaders are clocked twice as fast as the Central Unit. While this leads to a reasonable performance boost, it causes enormous amounts of energy dissipation, leading, ultimately, to a significantly higher operating temperature.
Fermi is also the first GPU architecture with fully cached memory access which increases memory performance.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GF116 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 192 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 24 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 775MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 1.5GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 192-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 625MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Optimus, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance identical to a desktop GeForce GTs 450.

System Suggestions
We recommend a decent processor (Intel Core i5 Mobile) and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 560M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-