Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB | GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 438% | 465% |
Hitman 3 | 600% | 635% |
Resident Evil 8 | 438% | 465% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 392% | 417% |
FIFA 21 | 171% | 185% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 657% | 695% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 376% | 400% |
Genshin Impact | 438% | 465% |
Far Cry 6 | 679% | 718% |
The Medium | 571% | 605% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition.
The GT 650M has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GT 650M manages to provide 3.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GT 650M has a 275 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GT 650M providing 4.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the GT 650M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GT 650M.
The R9 M365X has 3072 MB more video memory than the GT 650M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GT 650M has superior memory performance.
The GT 650M has 16.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GT 650M is slightly better than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GT 650M is 346. The GT 650M having 6 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GT 650M delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition requires 45 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 5 Watts more than the GT 650M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GT 650M.
Core Speed | 625 MHz | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | Kepler GK107-N13P-GT-W-A2 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | Good | |
Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | ![]() | vs | 12 Jul 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 7.7
|
![]() |
vs | ![]() |
7.7
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.9
|
![]() |
vs | 5.8
|
|
1920x1080 | 4.5
|
![]() |
vs | 4.4
|
|
2560x1440 | 3
|
![]() |
vs | 2.8
|
|
3840x2160 | 2
|
![]() |
vs | 1.9
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1254 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 64GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 80.3GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
256 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | ![]() | vs | 384 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 16% | vs | ![]() | 17% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | ![]() | vs | 32 | |
Texture Rate | 25 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 28.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 16 |
Pixel Rate | 10 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 14.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 50 Watts | vs | ![]() | 45 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3360M 2.8GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1600x900 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs. Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK107 which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 900MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1254MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 45W, it is suited for average sized laptops. Performance Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is similar to GeForce GTX 660M. System Suggestions We recommend a decent processor and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 650M Mac 1GB Edition. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |