Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB HD i7 3840QM
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 1728%
Hitman 3 600% 2279%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 1572%
The Medium 571% 2182%
Resident Evil 8 438% 1728%
FIFA 21 171% 822%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 1518%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 2473%
Genshin Impact 438% 1728%
Far Cry 6 679% 2546%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the Intel HD i7 3840QM.

The HD i7 3840QM has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 36 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD i7 3840QM. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 22.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD i7 3840QM. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The HD i7 3840QM has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the R9 M365X, but the R9 M365X has 14 more Render Output Units than the HD i7 3840QM. As a result, the R9 M365X exhibits a 8.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the HD i7 3840QM. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the HD i7 3840QM, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD i7 3840QM when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 4096 MB video memory, but the HD i7 3840QM does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the HD i7 3840QM has 16. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the HD i7 3840QM is 83. The R9 M365X having 257 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD i7 3840QM.

The HD i7 3840QM transistor size technology is 6 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 M365X. This means that the HD i7 3840QM is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the HD i7 3840QM requires 45 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 5 Watts more than the HD i7 3840QM to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the HD i7 3840QM.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs650 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1300 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROIvy Bridge GT2
OC Potential Good vs -
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs29 Apr 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs
2.1
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs
0.1

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs12.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs16
Actual Shader Performance16%vs4%
Technology28nmvs22nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs4
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs2.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs2
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs1.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs45 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i7-3840QM 4-Core 2.8GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
N/A
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-