Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce 920M 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 737%
Hitman 3 600% 989%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 666%
The Medium 571% 944%
Resident Evil 8 438% 737%
FIFA 21 171% 322%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 641%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 1078%
Genshin Impact 438% 737%
Far Cry 6 679% 1111%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The R9 M365X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the R9 M365X providing 6.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 50 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the R9 M365X providing 5.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released less than a year after the GeForce 920M 2GB, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce 920M 2GB, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is noticeably better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 26 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M365X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock-vs954 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROKepler GK208-N16V-GM
OC Potential Good vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs13 Mar 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs
6.4
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs
4.9
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs
3.3
2560x1440
3
green tick vs
2.3
3840x2160
2
green tick vs
1.5

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs384
Actual Shader Performance16%vs18%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs32
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs18.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs4.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-