Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce GT 240M
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 1783%
Hitman 3 600% 2350%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 1623%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 1567%
FIFA 21 171% 850%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 2550%
Far Cry 6 679% 2625%
Genshin Impact 438% 1783%
Battlefield 6 600% 2350%
Resident Evil 8 438% 1783%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 240M.

The R9 M365X has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GT 240M. This results in the R9 M365X providing 16.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GT 240M. This results in the R9 M365X providing 5.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GT 240M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GT 240M when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 3072 MB more video memory than the GeForce GT 240M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 38.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GT 240M, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is noticeably better than the GeForce GT 240M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 240M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GT 240M is 58. The R9 M365X having 282 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GT 240M.

The R9 M365X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GT 240M. This means that the R9 M365X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GT 240M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 240M requires 23 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 27 Watts more than the GeForce GT 240M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce GT 240M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROTesla GT216-N10P-GS
OC Potential Good vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Jun 2009
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs48
Actual Shader Performance16%vs3%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs16
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs8.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs4.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.4vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GT 240M is a middle-class level GPU of the 200M Series released by NVIDIA in 2009/2010. The biggest hindrance it has is the fact that it only supports DirectX up to 10.1 so DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
It's based on the architecture 'GT216', same used on the GeForce GT 230M and features the exact same amount of Pipelines and same memory type. The only difference is the increased clock frequencies. Therefore, GeForce GT 240M is just a fast GeForce GT 230M.
Demanding games should run at low or medium settings, depending on the resolution + DirectX version used. Very demanding games like Metro 2033 might be unplayable even at the lowest settings or only playable at the lowest resolution, which is unbearable, even to the casual gamer. Even old demanding games like Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare cannot be played at MAX settings smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-