Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 1641%
Hitman 3 600% 2165%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 1492%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 1441%
FIFA 21 171% 778%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 2350%
Far Cry 6 679% 2419%
Genshin Impact 438% 1641%
Battlefield 6 600% 2165%
Resident Evil 8 438% 1641%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile.

The R9 M365X has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed and 36 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics 4200. This results in the R9 M365X providing 24.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed and 14 more Render Output Units than the Graphics 4200. This results in the R9 M365X providing 9.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the Graphics 4200, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Graphics 4200.

The R9 M365X has 4096 MB video memory, but the Graphics 4200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the HD Graphics 4200 Mobile has 20. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Graphics 4200 is 83. The R9 M365X having 257 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Graphics 4200.

The Graphics 4200 transistor size technology is 6 nm (nanometers) smaller than the R9 M365X. This means that the Graphics 4200 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the HD Graphics 4200 Mobile requires 20 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 30 Watts more than the Graphics 4200 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the R9 M365X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Graphics 4200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs850 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROHaswell
OC Potential Good vs None
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Jul 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs20
Actual Shader Performance16%vs4%
Technology28nmvs22nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs4
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs0.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs2
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs0.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs20 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile are integrated graphics in the ULV Haswell Mobile processors.
Their performance depends on the processor they are integrated on, as the latter defines the Base and Boost Clock, as well as on the SYSTEM RAM, which defines the operating memory clock, and whether the GPU accesses a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface.
Best case scenario, the Intel HD Graphics 4200 Mobile perform slightly above Intel HD 4000 Graphics, though some variants actually perform worse and so most modern demanding games will have to be played with the lowest settings, while a few aren't even playable.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-