Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB | Radeon R9 M275 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 438% | 414% |
| Hitman 3 | 600% | 568% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 392% | 370% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 438% | 414% |
| FIFA 21 | 171% | 159% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 657% | 623% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 376% | 355% |
| The Medium | 571% | 541% |
| Genshin Impact | 438% | 414% |
| Far Cry 6 | 679% | 643% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M275 are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.
The Radeon R9 M275 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.
The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R9 M275, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R9 M275.
The R9 M365X has 2048 MB more video memory than the Radeon R9 M275, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.
The memory bandwidth of the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB and the Radeon R9 M275 are the same, which means the R9 M365X and the Radeon R9 M275 have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
Both the Radeon R9 M365X 4GB and the Radeon R9 M275 have 640 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the R9 M365X is 340 and by the Radeon R9 M275 is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the R9 M365X is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M275 requires 50 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
| Core Speed | 625 MHz |  | vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | Venus XT | |||
| OC Potential | Good |
|
vs |
| Good |
| Driver Support | Great |
| vs | - | |
| Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | | vs | 09 Mar 2014 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | |  | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 7.7
|
|
vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 5.9
|
|
vs | - | |
| 1920x1080 | 4.5
|
|
vs | - | |
| 2560x1440 | 3
|
|
vs | - | |
| 3840x2160 | 2
|
|
vs | - | |
| Memory | 4096 MB | | vs | 2048 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | | vs | | 1000 MHz |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | | vs | | 128 Bit |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | | vs | | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64GB/sec | | vs | | 64GB/sec |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | |
vs | - | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 640 | | vs | | 640 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 16% | | vs | - | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | | vs | | 40 |
| Texture Rate | 25 GTexel/s | | vs | - | |
| Render Output Units | 16 | | vs | | 16 |
| Pixel Rate | 10 GPixel/s | | vs | - | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | | 4096x2160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 50 Watts | | vs | | 50 Watts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | 11.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.4 | | vs | 4.3 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | vs | Intel Core i7-4600M 2-Core 2.9GHz | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | | vs | | 8 GB |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | | 1920x1080 | |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Radeon R9 M275 is a fast-middle-class-level graphics card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next architecture. It offers a core codenamed Venus XT that packs 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at XXXMHz and goes up to XXXMHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1000MHz. The regular version should offer 2GB of video memory but expect to see gimmicks of up to 4GB. Its performance is still unknown so use this rank as a guideline only. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||