Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
Hitman 3 | 600% | 88% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 438% | 45% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 392% | 33% |
FIFA 21 | 171% | 27% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 657% | 104% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 376% | 28% |
Resident Evil 8 | 438% | 45% |
Genshin Impact | 438% | 45% |
Far Cry 6 | 679% | 110% |
The Medium | 571% | 81% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire are massively better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.
The R9 M290X has a 225 MHz higher core clock speed and 120 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the R9 M290X providing 111 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 M290X has a 225 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the R9 M290X providing 44.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the R9 M290X, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the R9 M290X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R9 M290X has 243.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M290X is massively better than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the R9 M290X is 1958. The R9 M290X having 1618 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M290X delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire requires 200 Watts. The R9 M290X requires 150 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M290X may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M365X.
Core Speed | 625 MHz | vs | ![]() | 850 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | GCN 1.1 Neptune XT (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Great | vs | Great | ||
Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jan 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 7.7
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 5.9
|
vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | 4.5
|
vs | ![]() |
8.8
|
|
2560x1440 | 3
|
vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
3840x2160 | 2
|
vs | ![]() |
4.8
|
Memory | 4096 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 64GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 307.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | ![]() |
1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 640 | vs | ![]() | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 16% | vs | ![]() | 94% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | ![]() | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 25 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 136 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 16 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Pixel Rate | 10 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 54.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 50 Watts | ![]() | vs | 200 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 12.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.4 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.4 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-4930MX 4-Core 3.0GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon R9 M290X put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon R9 M290X to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to twice as better as a single Radeon R9 M290X performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single Radeon R9 M290X. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |