Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Radeon R5 M210
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 1641%
Hitman 3 600% 2165%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 1492%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 1441%
FIFA 21 171% 778%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 2350%
Far Cry 6 679% 2419%
Genshin Impact 438% 1641%
Battlefield 6 600% 2165%
Resident Evil 8 438% 1641%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB are massively better than the AMD Radeon R5 M210.

The R9 M365X has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed and 20 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R5 M210. This results in the R9 M365X providing 16 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 175 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R5 M210. This results in the R9 M365X providing 6.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R5 M210, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R5 M210.

The R9 M365X has 3072 MB more video memory than the Radeon R5 M210, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 M365X also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 M365X has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R5 M210, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M365X is noticeably better than the Radeon R5 M210.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R5 M210 has 320. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R5 M210 is 104. The R9 M365X having 236 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M365X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R5 M210.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the Radeon R5 M210 requires 13 Watts. The R9 M365X requires 37 Watts more than the Radeon R5 M210 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M365X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R5 M210.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs500 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROJet LE
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Nov 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs320
Actual Shader Performance16%vs5%
Texture Mapping Units40vs20
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).

Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Radeon R5 M210 is an upcoming entry-level graphics card based on the 28nm, Graphics Core Next architecture.
It offers a core codenamed Jet LE that packs 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 64-bit memory interface of DDR3. While the central unit runs at 450MHz and goes up to 500MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 900MHz. The regular version should offer 1GB of video memory but expect to see gimmicks of up to 2GB.
Technically the successor to Radeon HD 6430M/Radeon HD 7430M, the new modified Core offers twice as much Shader Processing Units and thus R5 M210 will offer superior performance at DirectX 11 games. However, its still an overall weak card and so most demanding games will have to be playable at reduced settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants