Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB | GeForce GTX 780M SLI |
| Hitman 3 | 600% | 56% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 438% | 20% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 392% | 10% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 438% | 20% |
| FIFA 21 | 171% | 39% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 657% | 69% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 376% | 6% |
| Genshin Impact | 438% | 20% |
| Far Cry 6 | 679% | 74% |
| The Medium | 571% | 50% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M SLI are massively better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.
The GTX 780M has a 146 MHz higher core clock speed and 216 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 780M providing 172.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 780M has a 146 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 780M providing 39.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 780M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 780M.
The GTX 780M has 4096 MB more video memory than the R9 M365X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 780M also has superior memory performance overall.
The GTX 780M has 256 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780M is massively better than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI has 3072. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780M is 2448. The GTX 780M having 2108 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 780M requires 150 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M365X.
| Core Speed | 625 MHz | vs |  | 771 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | | 797 MHz | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | Kepler GK104 (x2) | |||
| OC Potential | Good |
|
vs | Fair | |
| Driver Support | Great |
| vs | - | |
| Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | | vs | 30 May 2013 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 7.7
|
vs | |
10
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 5.9
|
vs | |
10
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 4.5
|
vs | |
9.6
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 3
|
vs | |
7.2
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 2
|
vs | |
5.4
|
|
| Memory | 4096 MB | vs | | 8192 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | | 1250 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | | 512 Bit | |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | | vs | | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64GB/sec | vs | | 320GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | |
vs | 0 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 640 | vs | | 3072 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 16% | vs | | 100% | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | vs | | 256 | |
| Texture Rate | 25 GTexel/s | vs | | 197.4 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 16 | vs | | 64 | |
| Pixel Rate | 10 GPixel/s | vs | | 49.3 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | | 4096x2160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 50 Watts | | vs | 200 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | 11.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.4 | | vs | 4.3 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | yes | | vs | no | |
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | | vs | Intel Core i7-4930MX 4-Core 3.0GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | | vs | | 8 GB |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | vs | | 2560x1600 | |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a combination of 2 GeForce GTX 780M put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology. Together, this combination offers 3072 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This, on a 256-bit memory interface, per card, of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 771MHz and goes up to 797MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1250MHz. Best case scenario, this combination is expected to offer similar perform to a single desktop GeForce GTX Titan but ultimately, its performance depends on the driver support and on the 3D application. Therefore, and paired with a powerful processor, all demanding games should be playable at the highest settings. Still, this combination might surpass the 220W barrier of TDP and so only a few laptops will offer it. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||