Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 64%
Hitman 3 600% 113%
Resident Evil 8 438% 64%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 50%
FIFA 21 171% 17%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 130%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 45%
Genshin Impact 438% 64%
Far Cry 6 679% 137%
The Medium 571% 104%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M SLI are massively better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.

The GTX 770M has a 186 MHz higher core clock speed and 120 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 770M providing 104.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 770M has a 186 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. This results in the GTX 770M providing 28.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 770M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 770M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB and the GeForce GTX 770M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 770M has 128 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 770M is massively better than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770M SLI has 1920. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 770M is 1557. The GTX 770M having 1217 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 770M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770M SLI requires 150 Watts. The GTX 770M requires 100 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 770M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs811 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROKepler GK106 (x2)
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
4.5
vs green tick
8.3
2560x1440
3
vs green tick
6.2
3840x2160
2
vs green tick
4.7

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs1920
Actual Shader Performance16%vs75%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs160
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs129.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs48
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs38.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs150 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i7-4800MQ 4-Core 2.7GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a combination of 2 GeForce GTX 770M put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.
Together, this combination offers 1920 Shader Processing Units, 160 TMUs and 48 ROPs. This, on a 192-bit memory interface, per card, of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 811MHz and goes up to XXXMHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1000MHz.
Best case scenario, this combination is expected to perform better a single GeForce GTX 780M and deliver similar performance to a desktop GeForce GTX 680 but ultimately, its performance depends on the driver support and on the 3D application.
Therefore, and paired with a powerful processor, all demanding games should be playable at the highest settings. Still, this combination might surpass the 150W barrier of TDP and therefore require more power than a single GeForce GTX 780M, though delivering better performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-