Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 398%
Hitman 3 600% 548%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 355%
Resident Evil 8 438% 398%
FIFA 21 171% 151%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 601%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 341%
Genshin Impact 438% 398%
The Medium 571% 521%
Far Cry 6 679% 621%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285M SLI are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.

The R9 M365X has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 285M, but the GTX 285M has 88 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the GTX 285M exhibits a 51.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 285M, but the GTX 285M has 16 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the GTX 285M exhibits a 9.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the GTX 285M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 285M when running the latest games.

The R9 M365X has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 285M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GTX 285M has superior memory performance.

The GTX 285M has 1.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 285M is marginally better than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 256. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 285M is 154. The R9 M365X having 186 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 285M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The R9 M365X transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 285M. This means that the R9 M365X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 285M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the R9 M365X should consume less power than the GTX 285M.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI requires 150 Watts. The GTX 285M requires 100 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 285M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROTesla G92b (x2)
OC Potential Good vs None
Driver Support Great vs -
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Feb 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
green tick vs -
1600x900
5.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
4.5
green tick vs -
2560x1440
3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
2
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs1020 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs65.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs256
Actual Shader Performance16%vs7%
Technology28nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs128
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs76.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs19.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs150 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.4vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz-
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 285M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 285M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 285M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 285M.
Most demanding games will run at the highest settings with fluent frame rates (30+).
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-